Oct. 7th, 2003

richardf8: (Default)
Pharmaceutical Companies advertise direct to the consumer drugs designed to overcome the foibles of childhood. And all our health care costs go up so soccer moms can medicate rather than discipline her kid into sitting still for class.

So here are a few pointers for reducing health care cost:

1) Don't advertise direct to the consumers. Doctors are the ones responsible for developing treatment plans, and the money saved on advertising can be passed to the consumer. Direct advertising has resulted in the pathologization of everything from youthful exuberance to diminished sexuality of age; all done to create markets for drugs that are overprescribed and unnecessary.

2) Psychiatrists should ensure that proper child-rearing and discipline are in place before considering prescribing an ADHD drug. There is a difference between the incorrigible and the undisciplined. Drugs and TV should not replace play and parenting, but too often they do.

I probably have more to say on this, but haven't quite organized my thoughts. Let's just say that there is a certain lack of accountability built into the system.
richardf8: (Default)
As I hear this telemarketing thingy dragging its ass-bug infested butt through our court system, I become more and more confused.

1) The notion that telemarketing is protected speech fails a very simple test. Namely that no speech is free that requires the use of the resources of someone who is unwilling to be a party to that speech. If the person paying for an endpoint (a phone or ISP service) is unwilling to make that resource available for another person's speech, then the use of that resource is theft. Telemarketers and Spammers are misappropriating our resources the moment they dial or hit send.

2) One good point that the Telemarketers make is that the exception for political or charitable calls creates a double standard. For the reasons noted above they are right. A message to Politicians, BTW. I've already decided how I will cast my vote long before it occurs to you to call me. All you can do is make me feel less good about it if I was planning to vote for you, and better about it if I was not.

3) The pursuit of happiness entails the quiet enjoyment of my home. Ringing my phone without my permission is deleterious to that quiet enjoyment.

So now my prediction: This case will go to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court will rule that the law as it currently stands is unconstitutional because it applies separate standards to political and commercial speech. Our Congress will be unable to muster the votes to pass a law that would apply equally to political and commercial speech without making concessions that will strip the law of its usefulness, because our politicians will be unwilling to give up their phone pools.

And American politics will have once again extolled the rights of the corporation over the rights of the individual.

Oh, and as long as I'm prognosticating, Bush's request for 87 Billion to rebuild Iraq and "stuff" will pass with the Democratic amendments that collateralize the Iraqi oil. Because it really was about the oil, and the Democrat's desire to spare the deficit by collateralizing the oil will achieve Bush's goal of gaining access to that oil while making it look like the Democrats' idea. The moral thing to do in this case is to foot the bill ourselves for rebuilding what we broke, and to ride the guys who insisted on breaking it out of town on a rail, seizing all of their personal and corporate assets to help pay for it.

March 2025

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112 131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 13th, 2025 01:29 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios
OSZAR »